Challenging the Constitutive Rules Inviolability Dogma

Guglielmo Feis, Umberto Sconfienza

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


According to Searle (1969) a constitutive rule creates the very possibility of the entity it rules. Later on, other scholars - such as Benoist (2003), Conte (1983), Guastini (1983) - pointed out the inviolability of constitutive rules. In this paper we want to challenge the inviolability dogma by asking the following question: is it possible to have violations of constitutive rules? We will argue that a parametrical approach to constitutive rules can do away with the inviolability dogma. As a result, our approach allows for violations and introduces two different ways of exiting a game (semantic exit vs. practical exit).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)102-111
JournalPhenomenology and Mind
Publication statusPublished - 2012
Externally publishedYes

Cite this