Multidimensional poverty measurement and preferences

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

Poverty measurement based on income or consumption fails to be consistent with welfare: a higher utility (that is, preference satisfaction) of an individual may go together with an increase in the contribution of this individual to poverty. The equivalence approach, which consists of computing the money needed to maintain a given level of utility, is the way to adjust income poverty measurement so that it becomes consistent with welfare. We review four equivalence approaches, and we compare the properties that each approach satisfies or fails to satisfy. Poverty measurement based on deprivation measures, on the other hand, cannot be adjusted to become consistent with welfare. We discuss how weights and deprivation thresholds can be designed to decrease the discrepancy between poverty and welfare in deprivation measures.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationResearch Handbook on Measuring Poverty and Deprivation
EditorsJacques Silber
PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing
Chapter37
Pages401-409
Number of pages9
ISBN (Electronic)9781800883451
ISBN (Print)9781800883444
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Mar 2023

Publication series

NameElgar Handbooks in Development
PublisherEdward Elgar

Keywords

  • counting approach
  • distance function
  • equivalent income
  • multidimensional poverty
  • measurement
  • preferences
  • welfare ratio

Cite this