Abstract
Recent studies using long-run restrictions question the valid- ity of the technology-driven real business cycle hypothesis. We propose an alternative identification that maximizes the contribution of technology shockstotheforecast-errorvarianceoflaborproductivityatalongbutfinite horizon. In small-sample Monte Carlo experiments, our identification out- performs standard long-run restrictions by significantly reducing the bias in the short-run impulse responses and raising their estimation precision. Unlike its long-run restriction counterpart, when our Max Share identifica- tion technique is applied to U.S. data, it delivers the robust result that hours worked responds negatively to positive technology shocks.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 349-361 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Review of Economics and Statistics |
| Volume | 100 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 May 2018 |
Keywords
- household demand
- stochastic revealed preference
- unobserved heterogeneity
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver