Abstract
Purpose
The current state-of-the-art recognises three traditional valuation approaches. The current division is not sufficient to explain systematically all features that drive the development and usage of automated valuation models.
Design/methodology/approach
This practice briefing reviews existing valuation approaches, their pros and cons and more critical other automated valuation aspects or features; both based on a literature review.
Findings
This paper discusses and lists the six critical aspects or features, besides the valuation approaches.
Practical implications
This paper reveals the list of aspects or features that are important to consider when designing an automated valuation model.
Originality/value
This practice briefing discusses the inclusion of a multitude of aspects when considering an automated valuation model design.
The current state-of-the-art recognises three traditional valuation approaches. The current division is not sufficient to explain systematically all features that drive the development and usage of automated valuation models.
Design/methodology/approach
This practice briefing reviews existing valuation approaches, their pros and cons and more critical other automated valuation aspects or features; both based on a literature review.
Findings
This paper discusses and lists the six critical aspects or features, besides the valuation approaches.
Practical implications
This paper reveals the list of aspects or features that are important to consider when designing an automated valuation model.
Originality/value
This practice briefing discusses the inclusion of a multitude of aspects when considering an automated valuation model design.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Journal of Property Investment and Finance |
Early online date | 29 Sept 2020 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2020 |
Keywords
- Valuation approach
- automated valuation model
- features