Abstract
When deriving a detector, we are often led to consider design criteria such as second-order measures of quality. The aim of this paper is to provide a critical overview of these criteria. We first consider the case of deriving unconstrained detectors. We show that second-order criteria must satisfy a non-trivial condition to yield Bayes-optimal receivers, to be considered as relevant criteria for detector design. Next, we address the case where constraints are imposed on the detection structure, leading us to consider some set D of admissible detectors. In these conditions we prove that even if there exists a monotonic function of the likelihood ratio in D obtaining this statistic via the optimization of a second-order criterion, relevant or not, is not guaranteed. Results are illustrated by simulation examples. Finally, in order to derive nonlinear discriminants via optimization of second-order criteria, we propose a method based on the kernel trick used in the implementation of the well-known support vector machine method. The new method is tested on a number of real data sets.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 401-408 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | International Journal of Smart Engineering System Design |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Oct 2003 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Detection
- Distance measures
- Maximum likelihood
- Nonlinear discriminants
- Signal-to-noise ratio
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver