TY - GEN
T1 - Dimensions of GPS-derived Daily Mobility in Older Adults
AU - Kim, Eun-Kyeong
AU - Fillekes, Michelle Pasquale
AU - Röcke, Christina
AU - Weibel, Robert
PY - 2021/9/27
Y1 - 2021/9/27
N2 - Daily mobility is a multidimensional construct. Location sensing enables measuring an individual’s daily mobility in various ways and this has prompted the issue of choosing appropriate mobility indicators for a given application, in particular in the health sciences, where the aim is to link mobility behavior to outcomes related to health and well-being. We previously proposed a classification framework for daily mobility indicators and discovered six latent factors underlying daily mobility, using GPS data of older adults collected in a study in Germany. To reassure the validity of our framework for selecting representative mobility indicators, we examined the generality and robustness of those six dimensions with another GPS dataset of older adults collected from the MOASIS project. First, we applied the same method to calculate 20 mobility indicators per participant and conduct an exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Second, we ran the EFAs on the mobility indicators of each subgroup of participants by gender, age, and mobility levels. The six dimensions reappeared with minor variations in the mobility indicators of both the entire group and all the subgroups of participants, which implies they are general and robust.
AB - Daily mobility is a multidimensional construct. Location sensing enables measuring an individual’s daily mobility in various ways and this has prompted the issue of choosing appropriate mobility indicators for a given application, in particular in the health sciences, where the aim is to link mobility behavior to outcomes related to health and well-being. We previously proposed a classification framework for daily mobility indicators and discovered six latent factors underlying daily mobility, using GPS data of older adults collected in a study in Germany. To reassure the validity of our framework for selecting representative mobility indicators, we examined the generality and robustness of those six dimensions with another GPS dataset of older adults collected from the MOASIS project. First, we applied the same method to calculate 20 mobility indicators per participant and conduct an exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Second, we ran the EFAs on the mobility indicators of each subgroup of participants by gender, age, and mobility levels. The six dimensions reappeared with minor variations in the mobility indicators of both the entire group and all the subgroups of participants, which implies they are general and robust.
UR - https://somayehdodge.info/amd-giscience/amd2021/accepted-papers/
U2 - 10.5167/uzh-217800
DO - 10.5167/uzh-217800
M3 - Conference contribution
SP - 1
EP - 6
BT - Proceedings of GIScience 2021 Workshop on Advancing Movement Data Science (AMD’21)
A2 - Dodge, Somayeh
A2 - Demšar, Urška
A2 - Laube, Patrick
A2 - Siła-Nowicka, Katarzyna
A2 - Weibel, Robert
T2 - GIScience 2021 Workshop on Advancing Movement Data Science
Y2 - 27 September 2021
ER -