TY - JOUR
T1 - Modern Democracy as the Cult of the Individual
T2 - Durkheim on religious coexistence and conflict
AU - Carls, Paul
N1 - Funding Information:
I would like to especially thank Tom McGowan and Mark Cladis for their attentive comments and encouragement in the writing of this article. I would equally like to thank Marcel Fournier, Charles Blattberg, Alan Patten, Corey Dolgon, Laurence McFalls, and my mother Alice-Catherine Carls for their helpful suggestions and insight, without which this article would not have been published.
PY - 2019/12/1
Y1 - 2019/12/1
N2 - After the demise of Christianity, Western society did not become secular, according to Emile Durkheim, but located foundations in a new religion he calls the “cult of the individual.” This religion holds the rational individual person as sacred, and corresponds to a multi-faceted, complex, and diverse society united around individual democratic rights and modern science. Different traditional religions can co-exist in the cult of the individual, but only if they accept a subordinate status in relation to it. Durkheim maintains, however, that all religions construct authoritative regimes of truth and moral obligations, setting the stage for conflict. How then should modern democracies respond to challenges to their authority from traditional religions? This article argues that a Durkheimian response would be to assert the values of the cult of the individual, as this is the only way to maintain the integrity and viability of Western democratic society.
AB - After the demise of Christianity, Western society did not become secular, according to Emile Durkheim, but located foundations in a new religion he calls the “cult of the individual.” This religion holds the rational individual person as sacred, and corresponds to a multi-faceted, complex, and diverse society united around individual democratic rights and modern science. Different traditional religions can co-exist in the cult of the individual, but only if they accept a subordinate status in relation to it. Durkheim maintains, however, that all religions construct authoritative regimes of truth and moral obligations, setting the stage for conflict. How then should modern democracies respond to challenges to their authority from traditional religions? This article argues that a Durkheimian response would be to assert the values of the cult of the individual, as this is the only way to maintain the integrity and viability of Western democratic society.
KW - death of god
KW - democratic theory
KW - morality
KW - multiculturalism
KW - political liberalism
KW - Religious pluralism
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85060654532
U2 - 10.1177/2050303218823069
DO - 10.1177/2050303218823069
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85060654532
SN - 2050-3032
VL - 7
SP - 292
EP - 311
JO - Critical Research on Religion
JF - Critical Research on Religion
IS - 3
ER -