Résumé
The growing availability of big geodata allows survey researchers to enrich survey datasets with innovative geographic context measures. This development opens up new research opportunities and strengthens spatial perspectives within established theoretical frameworks. Against this backdrop, the use of crowdsourced geospatial data, such as OpenStreetMap (OSM), has increased substantially in survey-based social science research. However, linking OSM data to survey responses raises important questions about data quality and fitness for use, as the database relies on volunteer contributions and lacks standardized quality assurance procedures. At the same time, comparable official data sources are often unavailable, outdated, costly, or insufficiently detailed for many research applications. OSM thus emerges as a practical and cost-effective alternative. Nevertheless, systematic assessments of OSM data quality remain essential as variations in OSM coverage and accuracy may affect substantive research findings.
This tool fills this critical void and serves as an innovative hands-on primer on OSM data quality checks in survey-based analyses. Specifically, it focuses on assessing the completeness and coverage of OSM POI data when used to objectively proxy local public service provision in survey-based research.
This tool fills this critical void and serves as an innovative hands-on primer on OSM data quality checks in survey-based analyses. Specifically, it focuses on assessing the completeness and coverage of OSM POI data when used to objectively proxy local public service provision in survey-based research.
| langue originale | Anglais |
|---|---|
| Médias de la production | Web |
| état | Publié - 1 avr. 2026 |
Contient cette citation
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver