TY - JOUR
T1 - Ranking functional urban regions
T2 - A comparison of interaction and node attribute data
AU - Limtanakool, Narisra
AU - Schwanen, Tim
AU - Dijst, Martin
PY - 2007/2
Y1 - 2007/2
N2 - Although many studies employ either interaction- or node-attribute data to study the positions of cities in the urban system, relatively little is known about the relationships between these two different types of data. This study explores this relationship by ranking and comparing 39 metropolitan areas in Western Europe according to their relative role in the system of flows and their concentration of functions. The former is measured via the intensity of interaction, and the connectivity or distribution of interaction across links associated with nodes. The latter is measured via four dimensions: its sociodemographic, economic, transport accessibility, and tourism characteristics. The results show that the relationships between interaction and node attributes differ for types of flow. Compared with business flows, holiday flows and node-attributes are less strongly correlated. We also find that the differences between the two rankings can be explained to some extent by the fact that corporeal interaction is influenced by the physical barriers imposed by sea.
AB - Although many studies employ either interaction- or node-attribute data to study the positions of cities in the urban system, relatively little is known about the relationships between these two different types of data. This study explores this relationship by ranking and comparing 39 metropolitan areas in Western Europe according to their relative role in the system of flows and their concentration of functions. The former is measured via the intensity of interaction, and the connectivity or distribution of interaction across links associated with nodes. The latter is measured via four dimensions: its sociodemographic, economic, transport accessibility, and tourism characteristics. The results show that the relationships between interaction and node attributes differ for types of flow. Compared with business flows, holiday flows and node-attributes are less strongly correlated. We also find that the differences between the two rankings can be explained to some extent by the fact that corporeal interaction is influenced by the physical barriers imposed by sea.
KW - comparative analysis
KW - interaction data
KW - metropolitan area
KW - node-attribute data
KW - Urban system
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33846667221&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cities.2006.08.009
DO - 10.1016/j.cities.2006.08.009
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:33846667221
SN - 0264-2751
VL - 24
SP - 26
EP - 42
JO - Cities
JF - Cities
IS - 1
ER -